Monday, October 27, 2008
Web 2.0
Since its inception, there have been a good number of us that feel like Ansgar in this video, without the hairdo of course. Terms like "digital native" or the "net generation" is more common in research about today's student in higher education and how to engage with this diverse student population. Students are comfortable with this medium.
Teaching in an online environment is prevalent on campus as well as off. Asynchronous learning or distance education is now an avenue in which college campuses teach around the world. The world of multimedia learning helps educators adopt new means of communication and to push content to users.
So why would a library be so inclined to use a Wiki as an intranet or a means of communication? Or use an online chat service like Meebo as a reference desk? Why would the discipline of nursing education want to use something as entertaining as video sharing website YouTube to push content to its users? (Skiba, 2007) The answer is simple. It is everywhere and a good number of people are using it. These Web 2.0 tools are being used to transform not only the entertainment industry but how we get our information, how we educate our students (Teacher Tube), how we exchange ideas, and in the words of Thomas Friedman, make the world flat.
The idea behind Web 2.0 is community and collaboration. The Internet is filled with user generated content. It is the user that is making videos, writing blogs, constructing websites and sometimes reporting on news that mainstream media misses. Anyway you look at it, the users are in control of what they want to see, hear, read, watch, and contribute. Taken from the Pew Internet/American Life Project (2007) statistics show that 64% of online teens use social networking sites. Whether the purpose behind these statistics is recreational use or educational, the student uses this technology almost exclusively and daily.
-Paul
Skiba, D. (2007). Nursing education 2.0: You Tube. Nursing Education Perspectives, 28(2), 100-102.
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
“Can u help me pls?!” Using AskColorado Chat Reference Service
Friday, October 17, 2008
Overdrive audio
By using the Nielsen Library Marmot Catalog, you can download books, music and video. Once downloaded onto your computer, you can listen to it on your computer or transfer it to your MP3 player (iPods should work). Some files may be burned to a CD, some may only be used on your computer or you player. If you don't own an MP3 player, the library has three players available for checkout to ASC faculty, staff, and students.
In order to use this free service, you’ll need a current library checkout account. You’ll also need to download two free applications: Windows Media Player and the Overdrive software. Links to both of these are available at the website linked below.
To explore this resource, you could start by visiting the front page of the Marmot Catalog and click on “Download Books & Music”. Or, go to directly to http://marmot.lib.overdrive.com/
Of course, if you search the Marmot Catalog you can search for Overdrive materials by limiting your search to Audio Book or Audio Music. Materials in this collection have a location defined as "Marmot Digital Library". If you'd like more information, contact Glenda at gmgeu@adams.edu or 587-7581. Enjoy!
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Digitization-Brought to you by Google
So what does this mean for the publishing industry? How does this affect libraries? Does Google have the right, without permission from author of publisher, to scan and post said works online? Does this cause us to re-evaluate copyright law? What about "orphan works?" Orphan works is when a book has not the author or publisher to ask permission for use of this work.
In a recent Salon.com article, "Throwing Google at the Book," author Farhad Manjoo comments that Google's undertaking "is poised to create a tool that could truly change the way we understand, and learn about, the world around us." He also asks a provocotive question, "Can we really afford to let content owners stand in the way of Google's revolutionary idea?"
The books scanned and available in full text on Google Books website are published before 1923 and no longer protected by copyright law. This means they can be scanned and made available online with fear of litigation from the author or publishing house. Other full view books include works published after 1923 that received author or publisher permission. Although, the books are not available full-text, it can be searched using keyword terms.
So the question is whether Google Books hurts the printing industry by digitizing books from libraries all over the world or can this only increase the sales and make information that might not otherwise be found available.
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Banned Books Week
Listening to NPR this morning inspired me to start a project that has been a long time waiting-a Blog for the library. This is the first installation.
On Morning Edition, they talked about Banned Books Week (September 27-October 4) and how John Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath was banned soon after its publication in 1939. In the piece, Librarian Gretchen Knief said, "It such a vicious and dangerous thing to begin...Besides banning books is so utterly hopeless and futile. Ideas don't die because a book is forbidden reading."
Nielsen Library's Instruction Librarian Brooke Andrade participated on a panel this past weekend on KRZA to discuss Banned Books Week. Brooke discussed the children's book And Tango Makes Three, which topped the Banned Book list in 2007. The book caused a huge controversy spawning an outcry for the book to be pulled from library shelves. The book is about two male penguins who hatch a penguin egg and raise the chick together. Brooke talked about the importance of intellectual freedom. She said that people may be offended by the content of some books but they are important for a library collection in that these largely unheard voices and points of view be made available for all patrons. "Politics, religion, sex, witchcraft" are just some of the reasons a book may be challenged or banned according to Judith King of the American Library Association.
Another 1st Amendment issue concerning libraries is Internet access. A recent article written for the HeraldNet discusses open access to the Internet in public libraries despite complaints from patrons that pornography is being viewed on library terminals. The debate hinges on whether a filtering system is censorship or if it is a librarian's responsibility to control what patrons view. All of this stems from a larger debate that public libraries face. Through the Child Internet Protection Act or CIPA, public libraries receive funds which is contingent upon the installation of a software that filters websites allowing only those that may not have questionable material. Now, no software is perfect and if someone is looking for information about breast cancer or a sexually transmitted disease, will the software deny a patron access? These are some of the problems with filtering software and these are some of the issues when talking about intellectual freedom, censorship, and the right to read.
So celebrate your freedom to read, to express, exchange ideas. This is your book, this is your library, these are your ideas.
Paul